Mind Maps

Overview:

Over the last couple of days, we’ve been reading about and talking about how the organization of information in one’s mind impacts retrieval and performance.   As we discussed this morning, learning is facilitated through a process of unearthing the pre-existing knowledge structures and preconceptions one holds.  For today’s lab, we are going to look at one possible strategy that you might employ to help with better understanding students’ thinking – mind maps.  Although mind maps are arguably more beneficial when created freehand, we’ll explore some web 2.0 options.

Objectives:
  1. To develop some basic strategies that you can employ to learn about new technologies.
  2. To understand what mind maps are, including some of their key features, and recommendations for creating them.
  3. To familiarize yourself with free web-based technologies for creating mind maps.
  4. To think about when you might use mind maps, how you might use them, and how you might decide what technology (including freehand) would be most advantageous.  (TPACK!)
  5. To construct your own mind map.
The More You Know:

Before we begin looking at some free, web-based mind mapping applications, I want us to think first about the strategies we employ to learn new technologies.  We’ve been learning about metacognition – a person’s ability to monitor their current levels of mastery and understanding.  Part of this understanding is asking questions like: “What do I think this tool is designed to do?” “What kinds of questions should I be asking myself about this tool?” “Where am I most likely to find out answers to my questions?”  Note that these kinds of questions are based on us making predictions and testing them out.  Each of us has strategies that we use as we explore new technologies.  In this VoiceThread called “Learning New Technologies,” former Year 2 instructor, Joe Friedhoff will share with you some of the strategies he recommends.

Now that we’ve made explicit some strategies for learning new technologies, let’s turn our attention to what Mind Maps are.  For our initial inquiry let’s see how Wikipedia defines Mind Maps.

Since we are under a bit of a time constraint, rather than having your draw on your own search strategies for locating mind mapping tools, we’ve included links to three free, web-based applications that might hold some promise. They are, in no particular order:

Evaluate three web-based mind mapping tools – either the three above, or three of your choosing.  Draw on the strategies introduced in the Learning New Technologies VoiceThread above.  As you check out each application, keep in mind these questions:

  1. What are the affordances and constraints of each application and how do these compare with each other?
  2. How does the technologies compare with creating mind maps by hand?
  3. How might I use these tools to find out what students already know about a topic or assess what they have learned?
Your Performance Tasks:

After becoming familiar with each tool, please complete the following tasks:

  1. Create a mind map of your own that demonstrates the ideas behind your TPACK project (see example below).
  2. Once you have finished your map, embed it in a web page and submit the URL of that page to the comments section below.  In your comment also detail briefly why you selected the application you did over the other ones.

Submission and Due Date:

All tasks for this lab must be completed by 8:00 a.m., Friday, July 2nd.  Please submit your web page with embedded mind map to the comments below.

  • #1 written by codsiren
    about 1 year ago
  • #2 written by pickless
    about 1 year ago
  • #3 written by shefrenk
    about 1 year ago

    This is a link to my mind map. I chose Webspiration because it is already something I have used, it has an easy interface and it had an outline view that I could use in creating my project.

    Having used webspiration, however, I found when I went to embed it into my Google site the size could not be adjusted and therefore could not properly be embedded into the page and I had to make a link to it! Not fun!!

    http://sites.google.com/site/maetkatie/home/embedding-mind-map

  • #4 written by scottfio
    about 1 year ago

    http://shibuya.weebly.com/mindmap-using-mindomo.html

    I chose Mindomo for my mind map as it offered a simple, user friendly ribbon as well as a little audio/visual guide which helped me understand how to use it quickly. The other two were either too confusing or too complex, (and one didn’t offer a guide which deceased my interest) each of which interfered with the mind mapping process as I was far more distracted by the tool than the goal of my task. This meant that the task would take considerably more time until I had mastered the tool.

  • #5 written by guttinge
    about 1 year ago

    A mindmeister map I created 2 month ago when working on the senior graduation media presentation.
    http://tinyurl.com/32wgmo9

  • #6 written by hickeyc2
    about 1 year ago
  • #7 written by guttinge
    about 1 year ago

    And to stick with the assignment.
    An online mindmap embedded in a website.

    I used mind42 for this map. I liked how easy the navigation is set up when creating a map.
    What I don’t like it that you can’t move a branch to another side, only up and down.
    When embedding, it doesn’t offer any scroll bars, resulting in keeping a part of the map outside the iframe. Only option to see it is to zoom in and out using the control panel in the corner.

    https://www.msu.edu/~guttinge/year2/Lab-4/Mind42/index.html

  • #8 written by guttinge
    about 1 year ago

    Actually, you can move the map using the mouse. I still would like to see scroll bars to indicate it better and show where you are in the map when moving it around.

    J.

  • #9 written by hunter57
    about 1 year ago

    http://www.weebly.com/weebly/main.php#
    I don’t have the plug in for it. I tried embedding it in three different websites. HELP!

    Here are my notes: Mindmeister only allows nodes from one main node, whereas, in Mindomo, you can create extra floating notes and use them as headings. It is a little more flexible in this way. Mind42 was both difficult and rather sparse, and therefore couldn’t perform the actions that I needed.

    Mindomo will change the theme with one click. This is something Mindmeister doesn’t do. However, in Mindmeister, you can insert images from your computer, something you can’t do in Mindomo.

    Minomo is a nightmare to embedd!

  • #10 written by hunter57
    about 1 year ago

    http://tpacktpack.weebly.com/
    Actually its this one.

  • #11 written by herrer48
    about 1 year ago

    http://miguelmaety2.weebly.com/mind-map.html

    After testing Mind42, Mindmeister, bubbl.us and Mindomo; I decided to use Mindomo because the User Interface is more complete and give the feel of working with a windows application (not a web application). Also, allows to embed youtube videos, images and allows to share your mindmap in different ways, like embeding it into a website like you’ll see on the link above.

    Bottom line is, I used Mindomo because I felt more confortable with the User interface

  • #12 written by hunter57
    about 1 year ago
  • #13 written by reedbrid
    about 1 year ago

    I looked at a variety of mind maps and found that After looking at several mind maps Mindmeister was my preferred choice. I like the visuals as this is an important element for me. I also like the way that you can move the boxes around. Embedding and making the map public is fairly straightforward and with a little practice this could be used effectively with students and colleagues.

    https://sites.google.com/site/frnce2010/home/mind-map-for-tpack

  • #14 written by melmotha
    about 1 year ago

    Of the 3 concept mapping sites reviewed I found that each had limitations. The adding of nodes and organization f thoughts seemed to take me too long and inhibited my thought process somewhat. Personally I’d prefer the speed of a pencil and paper approach and then to allow for hyperlinks/images/shared collaboration etc. to transfer my original thoughts. Of the 3 I found mind42 to be the weakest and most rigid in allowing for fast flowing ideas. Mindomo did have lots of features but didn’t have the aesthetic feel of Mindmeister, nor did it have as straightforward an interface.

    http://sites.google.com/site/drewmaety2/home/tpackmap

  • #15 written by isayolar
    about 1 year ago

    I played with several of the mapping programs and found each to have its pros/cons. I resorted to the one I found simplest (Inspiration) and then realized it had major limitations. It does not have embedding capabilities and I had a hard time connecting all the components so that they were are represented within context. My focus was on the mechanical aspect of it and this in some ways inhibited the thought process in some ways…however, at the same time, the visual representation of my ideas really stimulated additional ideas.

  • #16 written by isayolar
    about 1 year ago

    Oops…it would be nice if I gave you the URL, huh?

    http://lisayotpackmaety22010.weebly.com/

  • #17 written by hosbachm
    about 1 year ago

    http://maetlab4.weebly.com/

    I chose to use Mind42 because it seemed easy enough to use. I tried Mindmeister, especially because I saw it also had an iPhone app…but I found it not easy to use. I wasn’t sure how to use the “connect” arrows and clicked on it but couldn’t click out of it so everywhere I moved my mouse, an arrow danced across the page!! Mindomo looked alright, but once I had gotten comfortable with Mind42 I decided to stick with it.

  • #18 written by hamil271
    about 1 year ago

    http://hamil271.snappages.com/TPACK%20Mind%20Map.htm

    I was not familiar any of the 3 mind map applications before this lesson. Mindomo looked most appealing to me from the screen shots provided, so I chose to start with that. The interface was easy to use, not over the top, but still included enough features and options to make your mind map unique. I played around with mind42 for a little while and although it wasn’t difficult to use, it seemed rough and somewhat incomplete or choppy. MindMeister was nice and similar to Mindomo in several ways. I think the next time I use a mind map I will try MindMeister because Mindomo had some issues during the embedding process.

  • #19 written by baradije
    about 1 year ago

    Baradi – Mind Maps

    -I found the embedded code when I published it but was having difficulty opening it up to put it on my web. Maybe you can show me how to do that later. Thanks.

    https://sites.google.com/site/msuyear2baradig/july-1—mind-maps

    Comments

    1. What are the affordances and constraints of each application and how do these compare with each other?

    Although I found all the mind mapping tools useful there were some affordances & constraints. With bubbl.us I found it very simple. I could easily copy & paste info to & from it and make connections between ideas. There didn’t seem to be an image bank to select from. Also, it had a tendency to zoom in & out or move around if you put your mouse on certain places. Likewise with mindmeister it also was taking longer for me to develop my mind map with it as I found the tools less easy to maneuver through and was finding it difficult to upload an image. Thus, I’ve chosen to use webspiration which I was able to easily manipulate. I found useful templates, effects, & clipart. I was also able to upload an image. I liked that it gave me choices to download it as a Google, webspiration, or Word doc.

    2. How does the technologies compare with creating mind maps by hand?

    What is great about creating a mindmap on the web is that I can easily edit, collaborate, & share my work. If I were to write it out on a piece of paper, it would get pretty illegible after a while & then I would have to photocopy it to share with others.

    3. How might I use these tools to find out what students already know about a topic or assess what they have learned?

    Before teaching about a new topic I could get individuals or groups to start accessing their prior knowledge by brainstorming & connecting their ideas. Then to see what they know, I could get individuals to start a mindmap with specific concepts as the headings. They can connect what they learned about each concept, so I can see how much they have grasped and retained.

  • #20 written by pickless
    about 1 year ago

    Oops! Forgot to add my comments:

    I used Webspiration because, although I had used Inspiration before with elementary students, I thought this would be the most useful of the online mind mapping programs to use with my present Grade 4 students. I liked the interface and thought it was very user friendly. Although Mindomo, Mindmeister and Mind 42 create very slick and professional looking mindmaps I thought their tool bars were a bit overcomplicated to use with elementary students. I chose to create my TPACK mind map using Webspiration so I can become more familiar with that application so as to teach my kids how to use it.
    I think there is still a lot to be said for drawing mindmaps by hand and for children to create colourful mindmaps with their own symbols and images to help them internalize their ideas in their own ways.
    I frequently use mindmaps with my Grade 4 students as a means to pre assess their knowledge about our inquiry points. At the start of a unit I will start a mind map and put the central idea and inquiry points and ask the children to include their knowledge. I also teach the children how to brainstorm using mindmaps and have dabbled with using bubbl.us on the Smartboard to create character webs etc. I will definitely be switching to Webspiration now as I think this is even more user friendly and easy to embed in our class web site which was created using Google Sites. Although I did have trouble embedding it at first, with Brandon’s help I was able to get it to fit neatly on my professional website.

Comments are closed.